April 21 - I receive many e-mails criticizing me for saying that the regime in Cuba is fascist.
"Why do you call it fascist, when it is a communist regime?", they ask.
But, lets look at the definition of fascism: "A political regime, having totalitarian aspirations, ideologically based on a relationship between business and the centralized government, business-and-government control of the market place, repression of criticism or opposition, a leader cult and exalting the state above individual rights. By vague analogy, any system of strong autocracy or oligarchy usually to the extent of bending and breaking the law, race-baiting and violence against largely unarmed populations."
That, my friends, fits the regime of the Castro brothers like a glove
I never believed that Fidel Castro was a true Marxist.
In my opinion, Castro doesn't have any ideology. He is a gangster who has kidnapped an entire island and runs it as his private farm and the 11 million Cubans as his peons.
The reason why he embraced the USSR was because, at the time, it was a way for him to guarantee that he was going to stay in power for life.
As a matter of fact, I have talked with people who were with Fidel Castro at the University of Havana, who say that his true hero back then was Hitler, not Marx.
The fact that Fidel Castro doesn't have any true ideology, is what has made it so difficult to get rid of him.
He betrayed the millions of Cubans who believed in him, when he sold Cuba to the Soviet Union simply to insure his permanence in power.
When the Soviet Union disappeared, he became business partner with foreign piranhas who were willing to deal in stolen properties and exploit the only slave labor force in this Hemisphere.
Why is he disguising himself as a "leftist revolutionary"? Because that way he can count with the support of those useful idiots, who think that by supporting his regime they are getting even with those 'Yankees" that they hate so much.
Did you ever see any of the "Hollywood elite" embracing and posing with Pinochet, Somoza or Batista?
Did you see anyone going around with a Trujillo t-shirt?
Did you ever read an article in the New York Times or the Washington Post, or any other member of the main stream media referring to "president Pinochet" or "president Batista"?
No, because those are considered "fascist dictators."
Fidel Castro and his brother are catalogued as "revolutionaries," "Marxists," "leftists" and, as such, are entitled to the title of "president" even though they have never been elected to anything, or even allowed a free election in Cuba in 51 years!
I, for one, am not willing to follow the Castro brothers' script.
In my opinion, Fidel Castro and his brother are more fascist than Batista, Pinochet, Somoza, Trujillo, Stroessner, Perez Jiménez and Franco combined.
And if that makes some people upset, so be it.